| |
 |
7 May 2007
UK companies have the same 'mental barriers' when it comes to hiring
disabled people - Abacus
South African employers are emulating their UK counterparts when it
comes to a reluctance, or fear, of hiring disabled people - even though
there appears to be a consensus that there should be a change in the
diversity of the workplace. But excuses abound.
This is according to Org Geldenhuys, a director of Pretoria-based
IT recruitment company, Abacus Recruitment. "Interestingly, it seems
SA employers - who are generally paying lip service to hiring disabled people -
are suffering from the same 'mindset blockages' that UK companies
are. Employers are often scared, or reluctant, to hire disabled people
because they are put off by the politically correct 'language of
disability."
Geldenhuys, citing a survey conducted by UK-based Remploy -
the UK's leading provider of employment services for disabled
people - said four out of five of Britain's employers believe they
should make every effort to employ disabled people but many.
"The problem is that many are put off by politically correct
'language of disability'. "Indeed, the research reveals that more than
three-quarters of companies canvassed believe firms and organisations,
- independent of the government - should strive harder to create
a diverse workplace, including a mix of disabled people."
However, the employers approached for the survey revealed that there
exists a misunderstanding
regarding the language used to describe disability, most notably
around the desire to be politically correct and not to cause offence.
Employers interviewed in focus groups said they believed the
issue was a barrier to employing disabled people.
One employer told researchers that the words are always changing.
Currently one refers to someone who is blind as visually impaired.
This is creating awkwardness, it would appear.
Geldenhuys said he "doubts" disabled people are "so sensitive".
"I am sure disabled people would rather be in a good job then worry
exactly how other staff, or employers, refer to them. In part, I believe
it is perhaps just a convenient excuse not to pursue the employment
of disabled people. If this language barrier is, according to the
research conducted, a major reason for employers not hiring disabled
staff, then there is really something wrong in the corporate world.
It is not an unsurmountable problem by any means. It has arguably being
blown out of proportion."
|
|
|
|